nub
The new Holy Trainer Nub, a 1 inch long chastity cage.

I’ve long advocated short chastity devices. Exactly how short I like them has evolved over the years. My interest in minimizing the size of my cage began when I ordered my first Jail Bird. I followed the instructions I had read on many blogs as well as from the manufacturer. They suggested I measure my flaccid penis at different times to get the shortest normal length.

After lots of attempts I settled on 2 inches. FYI, this remains an accurate measurement of my typical flaccid length. I also measured the diameter of my penis. When soft, it’s 1 1/2 inches across. Based on the recommendations I’ve read, I ordered my Jail Bird with a cage diameter of one and one quarter inches (the recommendation was to order it 1/4 inch narrower than the measured diameter). I ordered a cage length of one and three-quarter inches; again 1/4 inch shorter than my measured penis length.

meauring diameter of penis
My flaccid penis is about 2-inches long most of the time. However, if I sit straight up in a chair, it goes down to 1-1/2 inches.
(Click image to view larger)

While wearing this cage I discovered that at certain times there was a significant gap between the tip of my penis and the top of the cage. This didn’t cause a lot of trouble most of the time. However, because there was a gap, peeing frequently ended up as a messy proposition. The liquid bounced around against the bars of the top of the cage. The resulting mess ended up on the floor and sometimes on my pants.

I decided to send the cage back for shortening. Mrs. Lion measured a 1/2 inch gap when I would sit up straight in the chair. The head of my penis was actually that far behind the top of the cage. So, I asked the cage to be shortened to 1 1/4 inches long. This is a very short cage. I was delighted to find that this short length was very comfortable. Bear in mind, my flaccid length is 2 inches. It turns out that a soft penis easily squishes down.

lion penis width measurihg
My penis is 1-1/2″ in diameter. Using the ruler method is an easy way to get this measurement.
(Click image to view larger.)

One thing that doesn’t squish well is the diameter. A narrower cage regardless of length will create medical problems over time. As long as the diameter of the cage is about 1/4 inch less than the measured diameter of the soft penis, all is well. The diameter shouldn’t be much wider. When an erection is attempted the penis expands in length and to a lesser degree, in width. The less opportunity for expansion, the better.

Several more months went by. There were still odd moments when the head of my penis lost contact with the top of the cage. I learned that if my urethra peeked out between the bars, I could safely pee standing up at home and at a urinal. I decided to push things a little more. I asked to have my cage shortened to just 1 inch in length. It turns out that this is the shortest a Jail Bird can be made.

The new, very short length turned out to be perfect. My urethra poked out most of the time and the device was comfortable. I frequently forgot I even had it on. Attempts to become erect aborted before they could even get started. That meant the base ring stayed exactly where it should and didn’t get pushed forward by a struggling erection. As an added benefit, the fact that I’m wearing a chastity device is completely invisible under my clothing. You can’t even see it if I’m just standing in my underpants.

1-inch long jail bird
My 1-inch Jail Bird. My urethra peaks out from between the bars. This is a perfect size. All you can see is the head of my penis. The rest is comfortably tucked away.
(To view larger, click image)

Others have realized this too. The folks who make Holy Trainers now offer a model they call the Nub. This plastic device is 1.33 inches in diameter and only .98 inches long. It’s perfect! Even better, there are Chinese knock offs being made that look pretty good. I ordered one from DHGate.com. It was only $29 as opposed to over $175 from Holy Trainer. I probably won’t get it for a while. That’s the only drawback of ordering from China. It generally takes about a month to get delivery.

The length of the cage turns out not to be very critical. Regardless of measured flaccid length, apparently all of us guys compress easily into a 1 inch cage. Our penises are designed to handle this shortening. They are not designed to handle squeeze.

There are several one-inch Jail Bird copies available on DHgate as well. I reviewed one some time ago. It turned out to be pretty nice. The Nub is a tube-type chastity device. It’s solid (no bars) with a single hole in front of the urethra, which can poke out nicely.

So, for less than 30 bucks you can get an off-the-shelf 1 inch chastity device. There are only two important measurements: the first is the base ring diameter. I can almost guarantee that you will not want smaller than required. Actually, a great size is one small enough so that a ball won’t escape when you wear it and it stays put and doesn’t hurt over time. There is no reason to ever use lotion or other lubricant to make a base ring comfortable. If your ring hurts, it’s too small. Try going up 1/4 inch or more.

The second critical dimension is cage diameter. The picture above shows how I measured mine. I just put my penis on a yardstick and noted the size. It’s not rocket science.

ht nub
This is the Chinese knock off of the Holy Trainer Nub. Note how the urethra neatly pokes out.
(Click image to go to seller’s site)

There you have it. A brand-new entry in the micro-cage market. Five years ago I would have never believed this. It would seem preposterous that my penis could live in such a small space. It can and has for years.

I think we’ve gotten over the long-held myth that a chastity device has to be inescapable. Hopefully you know that. A chastity device has only two important requirements: it has to feel comfortable 24/7 and it has to be able to prevent masturbation. That’s it. Comfort is critical. Your chastity device is supposed to be on your penis all the time. It should only come off when you’re keyholder wants to provide teasing or other activities. If you have a tube type device, it also has to come off for regular cleaning. It’s pretty much impossible to prevent buildup of smelly residue inside. Weekly removal and cleaning is generally sufficient.

I’m planning to review the Chinese knockoff of the Nub in late March or early April. In the meantime, if you get one please let me know how you like it. If you’re thinking about getting a chastity device, seriously consider my experience and order a cage about an inch long.

I was surprised last night when Lion suggested going to a Mexican restaurant. He did say he’d probably regret it because he can’t seem to make it out of there without spilling salsa on himself. True to form, he got salsa on his shirt. I figured we were both too full when we got home so I’ve delayed punishment until today. After a while, when we’d had some time to digest, I unlocked him and we had an edging session that didn’t quite make it to the edge.

Lion has been researching lube. He wants to use lube every time I jerk him off so we’ve been testing lubes. He’s loving it, of course. I’m not so sure. I think we need to use more lube. Lion says it feels slippery enough for him. He noted about a week ago that I may have to change my technique when using the lube. I’m going to try more lube tonight. I know when it’s sloppy I have a better shot at changing things up without hurting him. I can grab him with my whole hand and the lube will protect him from friction. It’s worth a try at least.

Last night we tried Uberlube. It comes in a nice bottle and you’re supposed to use a little. It got good reviews on Amazon. People definitely like it. It didn’t feel very slippery at all. But it’s hard to say. I’m not on the receiving end. I don’t know what Lion feels. I guess, technically, it doesn’t matter how it feels to me. Like spanking, it matters more what the receiver feels.

Since we’ve gotten away from our spanking experiment, (not intentionally, things like this always seem to happen) it’s only fair that we start a lube experiment. We will not rest until we’re done! Okay. We’ll definitely rest, but we’ll let you know what we find out.

Over the last six years, we’ve adopted many new practices. Our Female Led Relationship with Discipline (FLRD) is the most challenging of them. It forces both of us to get way out of our comfort zones.

In my case, I have to accept that I don’t have the answers. My communication style isn’t necessarily the best one with my sweet lioness. I can’t disregard her feedback since my bare bottom experiences substantial pain when I don’t do things correctly.

This is really important, at least for me. If Mrs. Lion simply corrected me when I interrupted her, for example, I could ignore her correction and never learn. On the other hand, if It hurts to sit down for interrupting her, I am acutely aware that there are consequences when I displease her.

It’s entirely too easy to disregard feedback from a spouse. I’m not claiming that every couple should use spanking to assure messages are received, but in our case it works. I’d like to claim that I knew this right from the start. I didn’t. I had no clue how things would evolve.

All I knew was that I liked being spanked. Mrs. Lion knew that too. So, she came up with rules that I was sure to break and would give her frequent opportunities to paddle my butt. Little did we know that I effectively changed my behavior and that after a while those rules were almost never broken.

Once I noticed this, I realized that Mrs. Lion and her paddle had the ability to significantly modify my behavior. I wondered if they could modify hers as well. She had no real problem enforcing behavioral rules that had no emotional value to her. Whether or not I spill food on my shirt isn’t something that gives her any deep concern. Essentially, she was indulging my love of spanking.

What would happen if she applied spanking to correcting things that actually matter to her? I posed this question quite a few times in person and here on the blog. I never got a really solid answer. However, she agreed to try. That started about six months ago. At that time she created two new rules: I would be punished if I interrupt her. She really hates that. And I would be punished if I acted like a know-it-all when I talked with her. She hates that even more than interrupting.

So far, she’s punished me a few times for interrupting. I guess that I get a spanking about half the time I interrupt her. I can’t think of one occasion when I was punished for being a know it all. Clearly, we are in sensitive territory. Speaking strictly for myself, I truly dislike being cited for interrupting or being too assertive. Ironically, I like the fact I get punished when I do.

I figure that if I interrupt Mrs. Lion, I probably interrupt other people as well. The same is true about being a know it all. I will be a much better communicator if I can change this behavior.

That’s the thing about the kind of behavior modification we’re doing. Even though it ostensibly serves to smooth out communication with my lioness, it also improves my ability to relate to people outside our relationship. She doesn’t have any quirky qualities that would make things that annoy her uniquely her own. Chances are very good that things she dislikes about my behavior are equally disliked by others.

When I look at things this way, I realize that stuff like enforced male chastity also ripples out to the larger world. I know you’re thinking I’m reaching now, but I’m not.

Consider: I gave up my ability to ejaculate whenever I want. I didn’t give it up in the sense that I wanted to wait so I will be hornier when my wife is ready. I gave it up by giving her total control over my sexual pleasure. That’s what happens when your penis is locked in a chastity device and you don’t have the key.

I admit it; I can be a spoiled brat. I like to get my own way. Mrs. Lion is just the opposite. She doesn’t expect to get her way and is perfectly willing to go along with what I want. That works well for marital harmony, but it isn’t particularly good for me. It’s not good for her either. Optimally, I am to learn that I can’t get my own way all the time and happily accept that fact. She learns that she’s entitled to get her way and is completely happy to assert that right.

Tell me that isn’t a perfect application of FLRD? Quite by accident, we’ve managed to convert my arousal at getting spanked into a tool that improves both of us. I’m completely accepting of Mrs. Lion’s decisions as to when I get to ejaculate. I don’t get grumpy because I’m horny. I know that eventually she’ll give me an orgasm.

I’m hoping that I will be equally sanguine about being corrected for interrupting and other behaviors that impede the flow of communication between us. I fully accept that corporal punishment is the best way for me to change my behavior. I’m not sure Mrs. Lion accepts that yet. Once she does, they’ll be no stopping her.

I can’t wait.

Can it be that we are a society of hypocrites? Here in the United States, we have a long tradition of sexual repression. The Puritans, escaping religious repression, had a moral code so strict that any sort of pleasure was considered sinful. While things have loosened up considerably, there is still an underlying sense of impropriety around sexual pleasure.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the way our society reacts to purely recreational sexual activity. Spanking is a perfect representative of this hypocritical attitude. It’s one thing to fantasize about being spanked or spanking someone else, and entirely different to actually do it. Apparently, it’s fine to get sexually aroused at dark, dirty fantasies. But actually turning them into reality is a horrifying sin.

No other pastime generates the kind of emotional response that sex does. God forbid someone should find out I get spanked on my bare bottom. This is particularly strange because multiple studies have shown that at least 75% of both men and women have spanking fantasies. Yet, when they actually know someone who spanks or is spanked, they greet this revelation with rejection and horror rather than admiration.

I don’t get it. We idolize sports stars who actually do things we can only dream about. We admire people who accomplish things we consider outside our reach. We do, that is, as long as sex isn’t involved. Do our penises and vaginas possess some demonic force so powerful that simply invoking mention of their use is sufficient to damn us forever?

Society grudgingly accepts that these organs are needed to produce children. Though, a lot of science has been done figuring out how to keep them entirely out of the reproductive process. But we do wink at people, “trying to get pregnant.” Discussing this, so long as the dreaded naughty bits aren’t explicitly mentioned, is socially acceptable.

I always figured that fantasies deserve to come true; at least the ones that make some sense. I always had spanking fantasies. Even as a young child I imagined being spanked on my bare bottom. I also imagined being tied up while naked. These fantasies made my little penis stick out straight. At the time, I had no idea what that meant. It did feel good.

It was a very long time before I actually experienced being tied up and spanked. I was in my 30s the first time. This was the beginning of my descent into the kinky life. In the beginning, it wasn’t easy to learn exactly how to safely pursue these sinful practices. This was before the World Wide Web. I lived in New York City. I read the weekly “Village Voice” newspaper. It featured all sorts of counterculture writing. Every so often there would be an article about BDSM. One of them talked about a book called The Leather Man’s Guide.

This particular book was aimed at gay men. It turned out to be a treasure trove of how-to BDSM information for straight people too. The Leatherman’s Guide provided instruction on anal play, enemas, bondage, spanking, and all sorts of other kinky activities. At the time, it was the only book of its kind we could find. It served us well.

Since those days, there have been lots of books published about BDSM practices and how to do them. Most of these books were self published and sold either in leather shops or later, online. Not until Fifty Shades of Gray became a bestseller did these kinky practices truly enter the mainstream. You would think that with two books and two movies devoted to romantic BDSM sex, that folks would admit their interest in doing this stuff. They didn’t. All that happened was that people made up new jokes about kinky sex.

Thanks to the World Wide Web, it’s possible to privately indulge in any sort of perversion you might be interested in exploring. Our blog is a resource for people interested in sexual power exchange. Thanks to Google, learning about everything from spanking to soapy enemas is just a few clicks away. I love this.

Ironically, in the years before the Web, less sophisticated online bulletin boards and paper newsletters provided city-dwellers with opportunities for in-person BDSM education. Almost every city of any size had at least one “leather” organization. These groups had regular meetings featuring speakers who would teach and demonstrate various kinky activities. I became an active member of one and eventually ended up editing a publication and doing live workshops around the country.

Those of us who belonged to these groups had a sort of code. We wouldn’t acknowledge knowing one another if we met outside the context of the organization or one of its events. I never really understood this. Seems kind of crazy to totally disavow any knowledge of my fellow kinksters. I could certainly see avoiding discussion of what we do, but to pretend we never even met seemed rather extreme.

Nowadays, online anonymity is a given. Mrs. Lion and I protect our real-life identities because we could lose our jobs if our sexual practices became public. Anonymity makes sense when explicitly describing what we do in bed. I don’t talk about my sex life, vanilla or otherwise, with coworkers and acquaintances. I don’t come into the office and say, “Wow! Did I get a great blow job from my wife last night!” We just don’t talk about this stuff. So it does make sense that we wouldn’t talk about the fact that my penis is locked in a cock ring or chastity device.

If recreational sex is considered an acceptable hobby, the opportunities for education and conversation would be amazing. What astounds me is the fact that virtually every living person practices sexual activities. Yet, almost no one admits doing them. Every guy in your office has jerked off at one time or another. Every woman has played with her clitoris. Yet, it never comes up in conversation.

How many people who you know have spanked or been spanked in the last year or two? It’s a pretty safe bet that some have. Enforced male chastity and female lead relationships are sufficiently exotic to pretty much guarantee none of us know other people in our day-to-day lives who practice it.

Too bad.